Size of the
Market:
In a 1999 market analysis
on the Pharmaceutical Industry in Canada and the U.S.A. by IMS (a
Dunn & Bradstreet Company), the sales of prescription medications
used to treat osteoarthritic pain exceeded $3,964 million CDN.
In response to the increasing
costs of medical care, and in particular the growing cost of "drug
therapy" for the aging population, governments, employers and insurance
companies in North America have continued to implement initiatives
designed to shift the burden of "drug" expenses back to the patient
or consumer.
This shift, combined with
an increase in the incidence of osteoarthritis in the context of
the aging population, resulted in sales of Over-the-Counter (OTC)
"internal analgesics" that exceeded $195 million CDN in the Canadian
drugstore retail channel alone, a 7% overall increase in 1999*.
The Medical Associations,
Consensus/Advisory Committees and the medical literature have all
documented the role of analgesics (including NSAIDs) in the management
of pain associated with osteoarthritis. However, the clinical literature
also documents that analgesics such as aspirin and NSAIDs inhibit
cartilage repair, accelerate cartilage destruction** and their ingestion
is associated with a number of unwanted side effects.
As such, medical researchers
and consumers/patients have looked to the role of exercise; diet
and dietary nutritional supplementation to arrest the underlying
cause of osteoarthritis and address pain management.
The result has been the dramatic
growth and market penetration of Glucosamine sulphate (GLS) and
MSM (Methyl Sulfonyl Methane).
While no specific data is
currently available to identify the actual size of the Glucosamine
Sulphate market there are over 30 brands and as many private label
offerings of tablets and capsules currently in the market. It is
generally accepted that the sales of Glucosamine Sulphate contribute
a substantial component of the $7 billion USD vitamin/nutritional
supplement category in the U.S.A.
According to the Canadian
Arthritis Society and the American Arthritis Foundation, before
the end of the current decade the number of individuals suffering
from osteoarthritis in North America will be in excess of 50 million.
What is
responsible for the market growth?
The primary vehicle driving
market growth is consumer/patient awareness, education and demand
pertaining to an "integrated approach" to the prevention of and
treatment of the underlying cause of Osteoarthritis. This is a mandate
that is heavily funded by governments, insurance companies and pharmaceutical
houses as well as established patient and medical advocacy groups
and associations (e.g. Osteoarthritis Societies and Foundations,
National Institute of Health (NIH), Canadian Medical Association,
etc.) For example, in response to consumer/patient demand, as well
as the demand of the medical community for more "clinical evidence
based" information pertaining to the role of glucosamine sulphate
in cartilage regeneration, in December 2000 the "NIH announced that
it will fund a $14 million USD study to determine if popular "natural"
supplement (glucosamine) work against osteoarthritis."
For more third party information
pertaining to glucosamine sulphate refer to www.arthritis.com
-headline news or www.medcenter-usa.com/departments/arthritis-
click on Arthritis Foundation.
Is there clinical
evidence for the role of glucosamine sulphate and MSM in the prevention
and management of Osteoarthritis?
Numerous clinical studies
have shown that glucosamine sulphate and MSM will produce equal
or better results than placebo or NSAIDs in the management of pain
associated with osteoarthritis.
For clinical information
pertaining to the effective of MSM in degenerative arthritis visit
the website www.msm.com and click
on "Health Benefits- Scientific Studies.
The clinical work pertaining
to glucosamine sulphate in osteoarthritis spans decades of work.
In a 1982 study by Vaz et
al a double-blind clinical evaluation of the relative efficacy of
ibuprofen and glucosamine sulphate in the management of osteoarthritis
of the knee was reported. In this study, by week four of therapy
the group of patients receiving glucosamine sulphate was doing significantly
better than the ibuprofen group.
In a 1992 study by Rovati
short and long term trials with "disease-modifying drugs in osteoarthritis
demonstrated that glucosamine sulphate was more effective than placebo
and equally as effective as ibuprofen (the most used NSAID).
A report in the Janurary
27th 2001 issue of The Lancet found that amoung patients with knee
osteoarthritis, long term use of glucosamine sulphate seems to put
off changes in joint structure and greatly improves symptoms. Dr.
Jean Yves Reginster conducted this study in 212 patients.
Based on the popularity of
this supplement, and the substantial use by consumers/patients in
the prevention and management of osteoarthritis, it is not surprising
that the NIH has committed $14 million USD to further study the
benefits of this important dietary nutrition supplement.
